|
1. |
Designed for
the Industry by the Industry is what
makes this study far different than anything else
that’s available in the chemical industry today. The
design is based on the input and guidance of the
eleven companies that form the Steering Committee.
This ensures coverage of issues critical to the
industry. The end result is specific insights into
not just metrics but also processes, technology and
organizational practices in global chemicals supply
chain management. |
|
2. |
A
large number of participants in a study
helps substantiate the results and individual
findings. Over 260 chemical businesses participated
in the 2005 study. The aim is to expand the
participation to almost 500 for the 2007 study -
making this study the largest and most detailed in
the industry. |
|
3. |
The study avoids broad industry comparisons
by focusing on business unit level comparisons and
analysis and by grouping businesses with similar
supply chain operations we assure more meaningful
results. For example, a specialty chemical business
will only be compared to other specialty chemical
businesses and will not be grouped or compared with
commodity businesses. |
| 4. |
Detailed and
“Actionable” was something we heard from
the Steering Committee. As it should be, the study
is detailed and comprehensive without being overly
taxing on resources. This ensures that the results
are “actionable” and that they can equally validate
current plans and projects as reveal new improvement
opportunities. |
| 5. |
Benchmarking
metrics with context allows a complete
analysis of operational processes and performance
metrics. Without contextual insights, metrics have
very little value. Therefore, metric related
questions are surrounded by organizational
structure, processes and technology questions to
provide participants with a full picture on how
something is being accomplished. |